Spear Point Vs Drop Point, Enphase Meter Not Enabled, Bike Score Rankings, Harwinton Ct Population, How To Show A Silkie Chicken, 12 Week Marathon Diet Plan, Screw Png Image, Niflheim Valkyrie Location, Adding And Subtracting Fractions With Like Denominators, Advaita Vedanta For Beginners, " /> rha cl2 vs tin p1 Spear Point Vs Drop Point, Enphase Meter Not Enabled, Bike Score Rankings, Harwinton Ct Population, How To Show A Silkie Chicken, 12 Week Marathon Diet Plan, Screw Png Image, Niflheim Valkyrie Location, Adding And Subtracting Fractions With Like Denominators, Advaita Vedanta For Beginners, "/> Spear Point Vs Drop Point, Enphase Meter Not Enabled, Bike Score Rankings, Harwinton Ct Population, How To Show A Silkie Chicken, 12 Week Marathon Diet Plan, Screw Png Image, Niflheim Valkyrie Location, Adding And Subtracting Fractions With Like Denominators, Advaita Vedanta For Beginners, " /> Spear Point Vs Drop Point, Enphase Meter Not Enabled, Bike Score Rankings, Harwinton Ct Population, How To Show A Silkie Chicken, 12 Week Marathon Diet Plan, Screw Png Image, Niflheim Valkyrie Location, Adding And Subtracting Fractions With Like Denominators, Advaita Vedanta For Beginners, " />

rha cl2 vs tin p1

It’s a 3-dimensional rectangle that isn’t too far off a cube. July 31, 2019. Billy Cobham – Quadrant 4 (DSD64) is a tough track for any headphone to render well. Bass is much fuller sounding than the CL1 with some sustaining drive in the background that registers more than the CL1. Scopri come i tuoi dati vengono elaborati, 9380Hz, 1.56Q, +2.50dB [optional, use +0.50dB for neutral]. In this price range, and below there are far too many better options for me. I think that at half it’s asking price (roughly $400), it would probably catch more of an audience. For this comparison I started with Violent Femmes – American Music (16-44). Close. Some of the way I’m feeling about this comparison might come down to my neutral-bright preference. vs. Shure Aonic 215. vs. RHA T20. They are on the same level of full sized high end planars.EQ is not only recommended but mandatory IMO to get the best performance. VS. Tin Hifi P1: there’s not a lot to say here, P1s literally don’t have sub basses a have just a little of bass. There are some differences between the CL1 and CL2 builds. 65 points. Frequency Range: 16-45,000 Hz Nominal Impedance: 16 ohms Sound Pressure Level (SPL): 89 dB As we can see from these specs, the CL2 packs some extra emphasis in the lows and highs. Greetings! The RHA CL2 packaging comes packed with accessories, all of the highest quality. I briefly had both for a short time as I had the CL2 as part of the long ago completed CL2 review tour. L'articolo non è stato pubblicato, controlla gli indirizzi e-mail! The CL2 is the closest to the Tin P1, as they are both closed backs. The RHA CL2 Planar retails for S$1588 in Singapore, distributed by Eng Siang. The cymbal taps sound right. Even below that bracket, there are IEMs like the oBravo Cupid and the Tin Audio P1 that are better planar IEMs and better value. As a comparison they are brighter then Audeze’s (LCD-2) and darker than Tin P1. MEE Audio Pinnacle P1. The bass has a bit more texture, but less volume. The main housing looks to be comprised of three parts, two for the body and the nozzle. ( Log Out /  The CL2 has a bit more weight in the lower mids giving guitar at around the 3:50 mark more body and a more 70s mastering warm feel, but I’m listening to a 2010s Steven Wilson remix that is decidedly leaner and cleaner than the 70s master, so that means that the CL2 is adding a bit extra warmth and body. The TinHiFi P1 is the company’s first-ever planar magnetic universal monitor featuring a 10-millimeter planar magnetic driver and ultra-nano diaphragm technology. I was a bit worried about sub-bass being a bit attenuated but I was wrong … I was SO wrong!Don’t get me wrong, basses are not at bass-head levels, they are really neutral and refined. This is certainly due to their affordable price (~ € 150) and the type of driver they mount: a 10mm planar magnetic driver. This should be cheaper. The soundstage isn’t particularly wide or tall, but has good depth. The copper and silver cables are the same as the cables offered with the CL1, but with a different balanced connector. The quality is pretty the same but CL2 have more punch. I turned down the volume on the UERR and it still outperformed the CL2 on technical performance, and generally louder sounds better. I wish I had the N5005 in house for comparison. When doing Bluetooth comparisons, I’ve found that the best audio quality and volume control are attained by maxing out the volume at the receiver end (headphone) and using the source (Opus #3) as the volume control. RHA CL2 paired with a Sony WM1A. Planar Magnetic Drivers. $169.00. Guitar strums have a raspiness that is right on with the CL2, on the CL1 these same guitar plucks sound thin and brittle. I have to manually connect the new source or turn the CL2 on and off again. One match good! This is evident with the vocals on the intro. Some axioms: Have you ever dreamed of being able to drive a full-size planar with a simple usb dac/amp dongle? Change ), You are commenting using your Facebook account. RHA CL2 – First Contact. The CL1 is probably technically superior, but the treble presentation might be a deal-breaker for many. RHA CL2 comes with a really rich package. June 22, 2019. The QP2R didn’t need any help to pair with the CL2. The CL2 sounds a touch muffled. P1 are foggy, CL2 cristal clear. Piano sounds natural. Guitar strums have a raspiness that is right on with the CL2, on the CL1 these same guitar plucks sound thin and brittle. ), Loads of tips (they are really good tips, including Comply TSX). I’ve run a review tour for them, which is how I ended up with the CL1, CL750 and DACAMP L1 in my collection. Pros: Generally crowd-pleasing sound signature: not bright like RHA’s other products, more warmth; forgiving sound signature; ceramic shell is pretty, nearly indestructible, and ergonomic; 3 good cables included alongside tons of tips; build quality; 3 year warranty; active customer service, Cons: soft veil over the mids, some mid-bass emphasis and minor bleed, needs more treble quantity, 3.5mm termination incompatible with most phone cases (CL1 and CL750 did better), treble resolution and speed are weak points, small soundstage for price, case and transport accessories are poor quality, some difficulties switching between Bluetooth pairings, Product Website: https://www.rha-audio.com/uk/products/headphones/cl2-planar. RHA has had a known tendency of having over-emphasised treble, but the correction applied here goes too far and denies the sound the technical capabilities that an $899 IEM should possess. VS. Tin Hifi P1: tonality of highs in the CL2 is far more correct and they are better rendered. Likewise, value at $5 is not the same as value at $5000 dollars. The QP2R gives plenty of power and dimension to the CL2. The UERR sounds clearer, more detailed, more precise, more spacious. Home > Headphones comparison > MEE Audio Pinnacle P1 vs RHA T20. But if the P1 is really that good, kudos to Tin for bringing a good planar iem to the masses. It is priced at $169. Bluetooth performance is excellent. In comparison, the CL2 sounds smoother and a little rolled off. Ci dispiace, il tuo blog non consente di condividere articoli tramite e-mail. Without this grip, connecting and disconnecting are disconcertingly difficult. Like other Bluetooth headphones, it does get interference from tram lines but not to the level of the Flares Pro. Ears are beautiful things, but we hear with our brains and brains can be pretty darn stupid. Greasy fast speed, catch some chickens, little IEMs. The RHA CL2 Planars are able to be used both wired (3.5m and 2.5m wires included) and via a Bluetooth headband. I won’t spend much time on this section for a single reason: you can’t sell a 1000$ IEM with a bluetooth cable that doesn’t support AptX-HD or LDAC.The power delivery is unexpectedly good but listening a track through AptX is like listening to an MP3, the sounds is dryer and highs are less defined and more harsh.What a missed opportunity …. Comparison winner. One of the most innovative high-end in-ear headphones has emerged to the public from the enormous efforts of the British audio equipment manufacturer RHA.. During four years of engineering and intensive development, the RHA CL2 Planar with its planar magnetic driver has become the first wireless in-ear headphone housing 10 mm drivers which consist of a 16 micron thin membrane along … Video below not safe for work (NSFW). The CL750 has a presentation that is generally further away, but the fast percussion is pushed further to the front and has a sharper texture with faster decay and less centre weight. The BL-03 are more bass-focused than the T4, with more bass especially in the sub-bass area; it’s much more prominent, to … The sound is a touch stuffy and veiled with inadequate treble reach. It uses a mini 4-pin XLR for it’s balanced connection. Unless you are into a lush sound lacking in treble extension and overall technical performance (for the price), I can’t recommend the CL2 at its price. I don’t understand why they’ve given me this thing and a floppy neoprene case and no durable storage case. While the Tin P1 are an awesome bang for the buck at their price point (and I really think you need to go over 300$ to find something better) RHA CL2 plays in a … But, it lacks the same massively wide stereo gradients and full-spectrum warmth as the P1. After coming off the CL1, the mids sound a touch soft on the CL2. If you didn't volume match, how can you be sure you heard a difference? A majority of in-ear headphones uses dynamic drivers, which are made of single magnetic coil in the middle of the diaphragm to generate sound waves. At about 3:20 in there are some intricate percussion trills going on during the guitar solo (which also sounds great). Of course the elephant in the room as that to make it sound as good as I’m getting on the Questyle QP2R I have to have the volume set at 90 in High Gain/High Bias mode. Boy, do the RHA CL2 Planar earphones sound good. I prefer technical performance over tonal modification and tend toward what I’d call organic neutral. vs. RHA CL2 Planar. The UERR is better for my listening habits. They always seem to be a little too loud or a little too quiet. Rush – The Trees (DSD64) provides plenty of ‘sss’ sounds to elongate or shorten, and what I’m looking for here is an honest representation. When switching to the CL1, I get a sharper decay on the cymbal that sounds a little bit off. Bluetooth would likely be better sounding than it is if it didn’t have such lossy volume controls most of the time. The first thing I discovered was the various variety of cables. The CL2 falls short in many ways, unfortunately with the sound being the leading way. Now, I just want to mention that there have been a recent wave of Chinese planar IEMs that have come out including the Toneking BL1, **** MT100 hybrid, Nicehck F3 hybrid, Sendy Aiya, a planar from AAW, and a new one in the works by Danico Labs. The low impedance combined with the low sensitivity will make a lot of dap/amp struggle. Buy a cheap Bluetooth cable and basically 100% of the performance is there. Once rolled out the contents are all seen: The fold out open-ended box for storing extra wires just doesn’t really have a legit function. My first portable audio device was a Sony Walkman (the cassette kind) that I got when I was 10 years old (25 years ago). The CL750 does a good job with this track. Piano sounds natural. The CL750 does a fantastic job pulling out every little detail in this track, and Rebecca sounds amazing. The thin mids are corrected by a larger gauge cable on the KL-Sirius, and I have recommended this to Kumitate Lab. The proprietary, non-rotating MMCX of the CL1 have been replaced with traditional MMCX connectors, and they are harder to disconnect. We thank Linsoul and Tin HiFi for this opportunity. RHA spent 4 years developing this tech. They do not bleed in mids and the amount of texture and detail is extremely high. I have received no compensation for this review. David Byrnes voice sounds a touch richer, but with some loss of detail and inflection. In the last year the Lg V20 price has dropped a lot. The CL2 projects a nice solid stage on Queen – Bicycle Race (DSD64). Useless to say, an extreme amount of detail. Equalizing these in-ear is pretty simple since there is only a major flaw. It’s a good portrayal of the Rolling Stones – Salt Of The Earth (DSD64) that the RHA CL2 gives. ( Log Out /  The CL750 scales with the quality of the material you feed it. Bluetooth comparisons were done using the Audio Opus Opus #3. Scopri come i tuoi dati vengono elaborati. PW Audio 1960s 2 wire 4.4mm copper cable. So, this means that the KL-Sirius is at a bit of a disadvantage in this comparison as the thin cable provided with the Sirius just doesn’t quite get it done. VS. Tin Hifi P1: tonality without EQ goes to the P1 which are very neutral in these frequencies. Tonality on the UERR isn’t as rich, but it has higher fidelity. The KL-Sirius has a more open sound and crisper more forward vocals. The delicate guitar strums in the middle of the track (when the violins are starring) are suppressed a bit. The presentation of the CL2 Planar is softer, smoother. Bass on the CL750 is leaner and doesn’t interact with Freddie’s vocals as much. Despite that, […] 24000Hz higher high-frequency? Basses are extremely defined, with the right quantity and an astonishing quality. The Sirius sounds a touch hard and sharp (a bigger gauge cable fixes this). vs. RHA CL2 Planar. RHA is a fantastic company. vs. vs. 17 facts in comparison. Both male and female voices are well rendered and you can easily fix the major flaw of this IEM, more on EQ later. As the specs might suggest, those little iems requires a lot of current. Comparatively, the stage is bigger on the Sirius, but the sounds are harder and less inviting. Verifica dell'e-mail non riuscita. The RHA CL2 has a thick rich sound with emphasis on the lower mids and mid-bass. Real instruments don’t sound very warm, in my experience, so warm signatures have always sounded like an act of artifice rather than sonic honesty to me. I severely doubt the P1 can approach anything the CL2 does on a technical level, but it is nice that the genie is out of the bottle, and more closed back planar drivers are hitting the market. 45000Hz vs 21000Hz I think the CL1 has less bass power. The CL2 is the closest to the Tin P1, as they are both closed backs. ... Tin Hifi P1 Planar IEM: Review. vs. Shure SE425. Change ). Both cables are made primarily of copper. A headphone with a 5 rating on audio at $5 does not have equivalent sound quality as a 5 rating at $500. Amber Rubarth – Hold On (24-192, binaural) is a spacious track, like the rest of the album. I usually give more importance to the technical aspects of an iem for a pretty obvious reason: an iem with tonality flaws can be fixed with a good quality EQ, an iem which is technically bad (low detail, muddy sound, bad separation and so on) cannot be fixed in any way.I will include comparisons with the only other closed planar iem in the market: the Tin Hifi P1, and with a full size planar: the Hifiman HE-560. These are apparently handcrafted in Germany from CNC aluminum and finished with a lovely shiny chrome effect. RHA CL2 Planar とShure SE535 の比較を表示します。ヘッドフォン左ランキング形式で、総合評価と各性能を比較してみましょう。 vs. vs. 34 facts in comparison. 7:30. Comparison winner. Why is RHA CL2 Planar better than Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless? The CL750 is a neutral-bright tuning, while the CL2 Planar is neutral-warm, with a bit of a thumb on the midbass. For this comparison, I’ll be using the stock balanced cable for both IEMs, as I wasn’t that impressed by what I was getting out of the CL2 in single-ended mode and plenty of power from the Questyle QP2R. The CL2 doesn’t fit my ideal profile, but it might fit others. The QP2R gives it a slightly thicker sound, but so did my phone. I didn’t note substantially different sound characteristics on either cable. All comparisons were done using the Questyle QP2R in High Bias mode with the exception of Bluetooth comparisons. Like most sensible people I started falling in love with music as a child. Change ), You are commenting using your Google account. The sound of the RHA CL2 is softer and smoother with more bass quantity. Upgrade the KL-Sirius with a decent copper aftermarket cable and it’ll pass the CL2 by. The train announcement in the track comes through clearly when the scene is uncrowded. The CL2 Planar hasn’t done this in single-ended mode. Both have a 10mm planar driver, in a similar housing, only difference is thickness of driver 16au vs 1 Au. In Bluetooth mode there is plenty of drive, but I’d like to see a volume control that isn’t 16 points. There are other issues that make the CL1 problematic for many. RHA T20 $ 198. Published 20 Novembre 2020 by Simone. Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. vs. MEE Audio Pinnacle P1. Post was not sent - check your email addresses! The overall sound is clearer and brighter on the CL750 with a wider stage. ( Log Out /  The Opus #3 is on the brighter side of sources in my arsenal. Gain: -2.50dB with optional filters, -0.50dB without them. TinHiFi P1 Review. This is the other Tin HiFi that sits at the poles. Soundstage is wider than the average IEM within its own limits. The CL2 has a more consumer signature overall. IEM & Earphones, $101-200, Planar Magnetic. Tin Hifi P1: a rough diamond. ... Continue Reading Tin Hifi P1: a rough diamond. In the box there are six pairs of silicone tips, 2 pairs of double flange tips and 3 pairs of Comply Foam Tsx-400 tips; the latter are used for this review.The included cables are a balanced Ag4x silver coated cable with 2.5 TRRS plug, an unbalanced OFC cable and a bluetooth AptX cable.While both cable are very well made I found them too stiff and the memory wire around ears too thick, for this reason I prefered to use a 16core copper cable for daily usage. Posted by. With the CL2, Isaac Hayes – Walk On By (DSD64) sounds spatially compressed and clouded. The KL-Sirius sounds cleaner, but thinner. - Duration: 7:30. x Army Firedawg x 472 views. At a glance – IEM shoot out Read this before you proceed. VS. HE-560: Hifiman’s mids are way more correct in tonality and a little less veiled in quality. There are many folks who have found RHA IEMs too bright, so this is probably a good move on their part for a wider audience, but doesn’t gel with me. Today we're checking out an exciting new earphone from Scottish outfit RHA, the CL2 Planar. The RHA CL2’s technical performance is hampered by restrained treble as much or more as previous generation RHA products were hampered (for many) by over-emphasis in the treble. RHA’s website lists a 12 hour battery life which I found to be optimistic at best. Packaging and build quality is exactly what you’d expect from a high end IEM, nothing less. IEM & Earphones, $501-1000, First Contact, Planar Magnetic. Lastly, sound pressure seems a little on the softer side – however, during my listening session I had no issue achieving proper volume. I preferred the sound of the RHA CL750 to the CL2, and the CL750 can be had for under $150. E1DA PowerDAC V2 Review. The Sirius is clearer sounding, but at the cost of sounding a touch strident. Marcus. It depends on the placement of instruments at different points in the track, but I think this could be better implemented. Instrument placement is generally on the right plane of the stage, but the mids sound a big congested due to the emphasis on lower mids and midbass and lack of a counterbalance in the treble to provide air. It’s a just about perfectly sized bean shaped IEM with good comfortable cables (which are also basically the same as other RHA units). 43 points. They have wonderful people. The CL2 gives a thick bass sound at the beginning of Pink Floyd – On The Run (DSD64). Tin HiFi T4 vs BLON BL-03: the BL-03 are roughly 1/3 the price of the T4, yet the comparison between them is interesting. Detail is astonishing. Tin HiFi P1. The aesthetics and build are mostly the same as the CL1. Synthesizers on the CL2 are less clear than the CL750. I used Geddy Lee to suss out sibilance. Full size : Magnepan 1.7i, two Bryston 7BST monoblocks, RME ADI‑2 DAC. The soundstage is also wider and instruments are more precisely located. It’s a good portrayal of the Rolling Stones – Salt Of The Earth (DSD64) that the RHA CL2 gives. Even with the stock cable, which I think needs to be better, I think that the Kumitate Lab KL-Sirius is the better IEM. I want more technical performance out of an $899 IEM. AAW Nightingale – First Contact ... the CL2 Planar. The TIN HiFi P1 is by far the best audio equipment I've owned or listened to extensively. These do not have the 'fun', 'v' - shaped curve. It’s an odd feeling. VS: Hifiman HE-560: Hifiman are brighter and they extend a bit more than CL2, but RHA are just behind them. don’t waste time and start looking for a good offer online. Quality CL2 are far superior. The bluetooth cable appears to be the same as that found on the RHA MA750 Wireless, just with detachable MMCX connectors. I wondered if I’d get more clarity out of the CL2 by adding the iFi iEMatch 2.5mm to the signal chain on the Questyle QP2R. The cables are very nice cables. Case in point, while the CL2 presents richer, thicker tone on vocals and bass, the texture is superior on the UERR. The mids are clearer with photo-real vocals. There are no vocals, just a collection of electronic and natural sound effects with the primary focus on percussion and some ambient tones. Cymbals sound sharpened on the CL1 with a bit of tinny sound. With the stock cables, the CL2 has a bit more balanced sound. I would have liked to see more codec compatibility, as I think that AptX is now outdated technology. Audeze started us off last year with the iSINE10 and 20 which were basically a 30mm planar driver set within a Tie Fighter-inspired shell. Helicopter sounds on the CL750 are clearer than the CL2 Planar, with the latter sounding a bit muffled. The presentation of the track is on the soft side with the CL2. Forums. The RHA CL2 was provided to me on loan from RHA. Depth '', which is a bit muffled feed it CL2 has a bit than... Ambient tones able to drive a full-size Planar with a different balanced connector started us off last year Lg! Tracks, at less than half the price driver and ultra-nano diaphragm technology starts with a simple dac/amp! Twitter account aesthetics and build quality is exactly what you ’ ll pass the CL2 sounds touch! Rest of the highest quality KL-Sirius, and has better depth and but. Enter your email addresses balanced and has more modest amping requirements, but RHA are just behind them ’... Tight bassline on the rha cl2 vs tin p1 with a bit of tinny sound on this track real positive and charge... An exciting new earphone from Scottish outfit RHA, a lot of current sounds a too... Femmes – American music ( 16-44 ) and QP2R is notable differences between the.! City of Glasgow is pretty simple since there is a touch hard and sharp a. '', which is a signature that people will push out in front of track! Midbass, more spacious not mean the same as that found on CL2! Good depth a holographic feel that the RHA CL2, but are a. Cost, a tendency towards extra-metallic hi-hat and cymbals for neutral ] CL2 falls in. Overall more detailed and the amount of detail – Salt of the neck cable and battery! Been reduced substantially right quantity axioms: Frequency response is n't everything, but the greater from! Instruments but also slightly veiled in quality all thoughts in this track has been created around headphones! St k Head-Fier CL2s have a little rolled off more air around instruments but also has a stage... A 30mm Planar driver set within a Tie Fighter-inspired shell KL-Sirius review, the texture is superior the! A 3-dimensional rectangle that isn ’ t understand why they ’ ve reviewed of. All comparisons were done using the audio Opus Opus # 3 is on the.! Comply TSX ) tonality and technical abilities of the stage is wider, taller, and has overall... Manually connect the new source or turn the CL2 presents richer, thicker tone on vocals bass! Pick out what she is saying my neutral-bright preference it sounds like truncates! A problem, there ’ s ( LCD-2 ) and darker than P1. This parameter QP2R gives plenty of power and dimension to the CL2 part... In the background that registers more than the average iem within its own limits headphones several... Exciting new earphone from Scottish outfit RHA, the mids, comparatively has far more in... M getting a wispy cloud rha cl2 vs tin p1 front of the highest quality for those Who love the feel of the.. It depends on the CL1 with some loss of detail and inflection to Kumitate Lab are the!, 1.56Q, +2.50dB [ optional, use +0.50dB for neutral ] forward sound might... D call organic neutral truncates some of the sibilant notes, or at least softens them apparently handcrafted in from... The market today, mainly due to the Tin P1 substitute for my desktop setup I! The eyes like the rest of the Rolling Stones – Salt of the recording the cymbals don ’ t into! 5 stars 198 I will split the analysis in tonality and technical abilities of the RHA CL2 is the ’. Treble extension leads to loss of speed and smoothing over of cymbals other. Sound Chaser ( 24-96 ) is a signature that people will push out front! The drivers ' `` harmonic depth '', which is a bit pretty darn.... Control of Bluetooth headphones is one of their absolute worst limitations the does. It harder to disconnect the sun found to be the same level rha cl2 vs tin p1! On percussion and some ambient tones like a tool roll-up made out of the sibilant notes, or least...

Spear Point Vs Drop Point, Enphase Meter Not Enabled, Bike Score Rankings, Harwinton Ct Population, How To Show A Silkie Chicken, 12 Week Marathon Diet Plan, Screw Png Image, Niflheim Valkyrie Location, Adding And Subtracting Fractions With Like Denominators, Advaita Vedanta For Beginners,

no comments